How Much Are Scanners At A Nascar Race

Case exchanges in "Maciusiu" - Letter to the Editor

I think that this letter, which was signed by more than 30 people, will speak by itself. We sent
Courier it to Szczecin.

letter to the editor

Dear Editors. We are inhabitants of Szczecin, who for many years to help homeless animals. Anxious to see "prozwierzęcą" the activities of Szczecin Branch Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, supported by the city. In recent months, came into force two radical decisions, which generate huge controversy and, in our opinion, harm the animals. We believe it to be premature, undertaken without providing any alternative, and above all without comparing the benefits and losses that made decisions will bring.

first one is not taking the shelter of animals whose owners wish to renounce. The second is the closing of the stock exchange, organized in SP 54 Defenders of Stalingrad Street, through the adoption of Resolution No. XXVII/696/08 Szczecin City Council of 27 October 2008.

years stock market was the place where the reviewers met with the animals seeking. Benefited from the very large group of people who donate the animals previously saved or found. The elimination of such a place is associated with risks that threaten these animals will have no chance of adoption, and even survival. The argument put forward by Dr Anna Kiepas-Kokot, president of TOZ in the article "The Last Sunday" that the stock market should be closed because of earning money on it, has nothing to do with animal welfare. People rescue animals, if you already collect any fees, offset in this way the costs incurred for board and treatment of such a pet. Transmit them to care for the next one, in need of nursing students here. Not everybody has the pękatymi portfolios. Help if possible.

We believe that the resolution violates the fundamental right to equality guaranteed in the Constitution. Exempt from complying with the resolutions were pet shops, Department of Municipal Services - Animal Shelter in Szczecin, trade grouping livestock and exhibitors during the exhibition of animals. We believe that this record of flagrant wrongs individuals, often anonymous, whose sensitivity is too large to pass by the animal harm. If exceptions are not in compliance with the resolution, you might as well turn to their circle of exchange. However, if we can all be equal before the law, if on that exchange, people can only donate animals, and not to sell, we believe that this should include all those listed in the paragraph. 18 Resolution No. XXVII/696/08 too!

Will instead of destroying a place through which many animals found a home, not better to introduce a control and enjoy the fact that fewer animals up on the street? With such control could be ruled out people who made the reproduction of animals with a source of income, and support those who bring real help. Instead of creating a working space and support to reduce the population of homeless animals we are dealing with those of the obverse, which can not be consent.